 |
 |
:
: NOTES ON URBAN HISTORY
:
: CONTEMPORARY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PARK AND THE RIVER

Arno river
|
: : NOTES ON URBAN HISTORY |
|
|
|
Up to the Renaissance, the area currently occupied by the Parco delle
Cascine used to be an area covered by thick vegetation interrupted
only by small water courses, ponds and swampy areas. The river Arno
had a much larger area at its disposal than it has today, wandering
and creating various branches and islets of different dimensions.
|
|
|
|
The
Parco delle Cascine, as it is currently, sits in facts on one of
these small islands, hence the toponym Cascine dell'Isola (Island
Farms), and underwent numerous changes in the course of history
due to flood deposits and
In 1563, they built the Fosso Macinante (Milling Ditch), and immediately
after, the two streams Mugnone and Terzolle were embanked.
For a long time, the Cascine remained an estate for the exclusive
use by the Medici, who used it for picnics and hunting, due also
to the closeness to the Pitti Palace.
On
the 3rd of July 1791, the park was inaugurated and opened to the
public, with great celebrations that went on for three days and
that are depicted by several paintings. This date coincides also
with the settlement by Ferdinando III, who became the Grand Duke
of Tuscany when he replaced Pietro Leopoldo, who had just become
the Emperor of Austria.
Nevertheless, under Ferdinando III, the Cascine were rarely opened
to the public, and only on special dates, like on Ascension Day.
It was only with the Napoleonic administration that a regular use
by the public started, thanks to Elisa, Napoleon's sister, who concentrated
her official celebrations in the Parco delle Cascine. During the
following years, the Cascine witnessed several events: in 1861,
great celebrations were organised for the Universal Exhibition;
during the years when Florence was the capital of Italy (1865-1870),
the park was used as a stage for all official presentations, parades
and other gatherings.
Passeggiata
nell'attuale viale A. Lincoln
tratta da AA.VV., Le Cascine un parco per la città,
1998
|
Foto
Alinari, viale della Regina, fine Ottocento
|
|
| :
:
CONTEMPORARY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PARK AND THE RIVER |
|
|
|
It is a well known fact that today there are several conflicts characterising
the Parco delle Cascine due to the role that this park has played
in the course of time, with the ever increasing load of a growing
city that found no corresponding development of a green areas system
with a even spatial and typological distribution, as well as for
the connections and the extension of the areas that make it up.
The inspections carried out during preliminary surveys for defining
the project have confirmed the importance and the differentiation
of recreational uses that concern the park on a daily basis. The
most common uses are strolling, cycling, resting and basic sporting
activities, such as jogging and skating.
The presence of the river means that the area concerned by the project,
contained between the right riverbank and the Viale Washington that
delimits the park, takes on a particular interest by expressing
a peculiar recreational potential of urban landscape.
|
|
|
|
| Vedute
del fiume Arno nella zona del Parco delle Cascine |
This
type of recreational usage concerns all riverbank areas with any
access provided by service ramps or river side stairs that have
been recently built with wood and soil between the weir at Isolotto
and the Vittoria Bridge.
The small dirt beach on the right hydrographic side, immediately
downstream from the weir, emerges with the drop of the river flow
rate, thus making it possible to practically walk to the centre
of the riverbed. Here, one can find visual opportunities that are
very peculiar: of the riverbed itself, and of the treed front of
the park, in a state of visual and acoustic isolation. This spot
is the only widening of the bank section that can be appreciated
along the entire stretch and, also thanks to the connection to the
park, during sunny and warm days, it is frequented in spite of the
relatively degraded conditions of the river.
This is subject to hydraulic maintenance interventions that can
be integrated with solutions and reviews with appropriate schedules
aimed at improving the quality of the river ecosystem and semiology,
resulting also as a benefit for the abovementioned recreational
potential.
|
Firenze
| Sevilla | Bremen
| Dresden | Bordeaux
| Tallinn
|
|